RBG vs CENSRD — CS2 Match BO3 at Group A
Map Results (2 maps)
MAP 1
FINISHED
RBG
🏆 16
CENSRD
9
RBG ✅ Final
| Player | K | D | A | ADR | HS% | Rating | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLASIA | 29 | 14 | 2 | 121.3 | 62.1% | 1.82 | 80.0% |
| HexT | 29 | 14 | 7 | 110.3 | 55.2% | 1.78 | 68.0% |
| hate | 23 | 17 | 6 | 103.0 | 65.2% | 1.38 | 72.0% |
| Swahn | 18 | 17 | 3 | 69.9 | 27.8% | 1.10 | 68.0% |
| wiz | 15 | 14 | 5 | 52.2 | 20% | 1.00 | 76.0% |
| kber | 15 | 19 | 6 | 67.2 | 80% | 0.84 | 56.0% |
| chop | 10 | 17 | 9 | 66.8 | 90% | 0.82 | 68.0% |
| Noxio | 11 | 19 | 5 | 64.7 | 36.4% | 0.73 | 60.0% |
| Walco | 8 | 16 | 10 | 42.4 | 62.5% | 0.68 | 60.0% |
| Delta9 | 8 | 20 | 3 | 38.8 | 50% | 0.40 | 48.0% |
CENSRD ✅ Final
| Player | K | D | A | ADR | HS% | Rating | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No stats recorded | |||||||
Round history not yet synced — will appear after next cron run.
MAP 2
FINISHED
RBG
🏆 16
CENSRD
5
RBG ✅ Final
| Player | K | D | A | ADR | HS% | Rating | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HexT | 23 | 10 | 2 | 108.5 | 56.5% | 1.70 | 90.5% |
| wiz | 21 | 9 | 1 | 87.9 | 28.6% | 1.63 | 76.2% |
| hate | 25 | 17 | 1 | 118.0 | 40% | 1.61 | 71.4% |
| chop | 21 | 13 | 2 | 91.6 | 38.1% | 1.43 | 85.7% |
| CLASIA | 16 | 12 | 9 | 100.8 | 62.5% | 1.36 | 76.2% |
| Walco | 9 | 12 | 5 | 51.2 | 66.7% | 0.75 | 57.1% |
| Delta9 | 10 | 18 | 1 | 58.7 | 60% | 0.65 | 47.6% |
| Swahn | 8 | 17 | 2 | 53.1 | 25% | 0.59 | 52.4% |
| Noxio | 8 | 18 | 0 | 39.9 | 62.5% | 0.47 | 52.4% |
| kber | 5 | 20 | 4 | 42.5 | 60% | 0.37 | 57.1% |
CENSRD ✅ Final
| Player | K | D | A | ADR | HS% | Rating | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No stats recorded | |||||||
Round history not yet synced — will appear after next cron run.
Full Match Statistics
RBG
| Player | Maps | K | D | A | K/D | ADR | HS% | FK | KAST | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HexT | 2 | 52 | 24 | 9 | 2.17 | 109.4 | 56% | 0 | 79.3% | 1.74 |
| CLASIA | 2 | 45 | 26 | 11 | 1.73 | 111.1 | 62% | 0 | 78.1% | 1.59 |
| hate | 2 | 48 | 34 | 7 | 1.41 | 110.5 | 52% | 0 | 71.7% | 1.50 |
| wiz | 2 | 36 | 23 | 6 | 1.57 | 70.1 | 25% | 0 | 76.1% | 1.32 |
| chop | 2 | 31 | 30 | 11 | 1.03 | 79.2 | 55% | 0 | 76.9% | 1.13 |
| Swahn | 2 | 26 | 34 | 5 | 0.76 | 61.5 | 27% | 0 | 60.2% | 0.85 |
| Walco | 2 | 17 | 28 | 15 | 0.61 | 46.8 | 65% | 0 | 58.6% | 0.72 |
| kber | 2 | 20 | 39 | 10 | 0.51 | 54.9 | 75% | 0 | 56.6% | 0.61 |
| Noxio | 2 | 19 | 37 | 5 | 0.51 | 52.3 | 47% | 0 | 56.2% | 0.60 |
| Delta9 | 2 | 18 | 38 | 4 | 0.47 | 48.8 | 56% | 0 | 47.8% | 0.53 |
CENSRD
| Player | Maps | K | D | A | K/D | ADR | HS% | FK | KAST | Rating |
|---|
Head-to-Head
1
RBG
vs
0
CENSRD
RBG
2 : 0
BO3
